About Me

Name:Wm Tate
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Countering the agenda behind 'Recount'

For weeks now, we've heard a steady drumbeat--from Big Media, from Barack Obama and other Democrats, and now from HBO's "Recount"--that the Supreme Court handed Florida and the 2000 election to George Bush, even though subsequent reviews show the recounts Al Gore requested would have increased Bush's margin of victory.


Tom Shales, in today's WaPo, has finally put into words the reason behind that: "If the mess in Florida had been resolved with as much skill and savvy as went into the making of the movie, the world might be a different place today -- presumably a better one...."


In the liberal media's halcyon days of Gore, we would all, somehow be better off. I beg to differ. I have spent almost three years researching and writing an alternative history novel, A Time Like This, that asks what would have happened if the 2000 election HAD turned out the other way.


How would a president whose top priority was international cooperation on Global Warning have reacted to 9/11?


How would a rapid conversion to a Green Economy have affected the nation's economy?


How would the liberal media have reacted to presidential infringements on the rights of other governmental branches and of citizens?


Not to disappoint Mr. Shales and his colleagues too much, but my research has lead me to answers that a liberal administration these last eight years could have lead to a far, far worse world.


Yes, this is a sheer vanity plug, but if you would like to see a very different interpretation of the effects of the Florida recounts than you'll see on HBO--the negative effects if the election had gone the other way--please check out my book, A Time Like This.


I make this direct appeal because I have had incredible difficulty getting media exposure for the book. Most newspapers simply don't want to give attention to a book that challenges their core beliefs.


Why is A Time Like This important?


By implying, or flat-out stating, that the world would be better off if the Democrat had won in 2000, Democrats and their allies in the media are also implying that the world WILL be better off if a Democrat wins in 2008.


As long as that conceit goes unchallenged, the media will succeed in rewriting, not only the history of what happened in Florida in 2000, but the future of this country.


-Wm Tate

www.atimelikethis.us


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Who will tell Keith?

Who will tell Keith?


Back in the day--before Reverend Wrong and bitterness and gutterballs sidetracked Obamaniacs--pundits were asking, Who will have the courage to tell Hillary when it's time to get out of the race? Now I have to ask, In the unlikely event that Hillary wins both North Carolina and Indiana, Who'll have the courage to tell MS(More Slanted)NBC that Obama's nomination is not inevitable.


-Wm Tate


Wm Tate is the author of the new book, A Time Like This


What if the 2000 presidential election had turned out the other way? Find out at www.atimelikethis.us.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »